Have you ever felt a knot in your stomach when someone says something you strongly disagree with, and wished you could understand where they’re coming from instead of reacting?
Buy The Empathy-building Guide
36. How Can I Build Deeper Empathy For People I Disagree With?
You can build deeper empathy even when your values clash with someone else’s, and it starts with intention and practice. This article gives practical steps, mental frameworks, and exercises so you can grow empathy without sacrificing your boundaries or principles.
Why empathy matters
Empathy is the skill of understanding another person’s internal experience and emotions without automatically adopting their view. When you strengthen empathy, conversations become less adversarial and more constructive, and you’ll have more influence when you need to persuade or bridge differences.
Empathy versus sympathy
Empathy means feeling with another person and trying to understand their perspective; sympathy often means feeling for someone while remaining removed. You can be empathetic without agreeing, and that distinction helps you connect without compromising your own stance.
Types of empathy
There are cognitive, emotional, and compassionate forms of empathy, and each plays a different role in disagreements. Cognitive empathy helps you understand thoughts and beliefs, emotional empathy connects you to feelings, and compassionate empathy prompts helpful actions.
Purchase The Full Guide To Empathizing With People You Disagree With
Common barriers to empathy
Understanding the obstacles you face helps you address them directly, rather than blaming the other person for the breakdown in connection. These barriers are normal, and you can learn to move past them with practice and self-awareness.
Cognitive biases and mental shortcuts
You rely on heuristics that make quick judgments, which can create caricatures of people you disagree with. Recognizing your own biases—like confirmation bias or the fundamental attribution error—lets you slow your thinking and reconsider quick dismissals.
Emotional arousal and defensiveness
When you feel threatened, your body goes into fight-or-flight, and that physiological response narrows perspective. Learning to regulate your emotional arousal lets you stay present and actually hear the other person rather than reacting to perceived threats.
Identity, politics, and social belonging
Disagreements often signal a threat to your social identity, and your brain may protect the group rather than the individual. Noting when a debate feels like an attack on your identity helps you separate your personal worth from the views being expressed.
Echo chambers and information silos
You may be surrounded by media and networks that reinforce your views, which makes other perspectives feel alien. Intentionally exposing yourself to diverse sources reduces the shock factor and makes empathy easier because unfamiliar views feel more familiar.
How to shift mindset before a conversation
Your internal framing sets the tone for any interaction; adjusting it ahead of time changes how you listen and respond. These simple pre-conversation habits prime you to be open and curious rather than defensive.
Set an intention
Decide your aim for the conversation—do you want to understand, persuade, or simply coexist peacefully? Naming your intention grounds your behavior, because when you have a clear goal you’re less likely to default to argument.
Pause and breathe
Take a few slow breaths to lower your physiological arousal and slow your reactivity before engaging. Breathing signals to your nervous system that you’re safe enough to listen rather than defend.
Remind yourself of common humanity
A short reminder that this person has hopes, fears, and a life as complicated as yours reduces dehumanization. This mental cue can soften immediate judgments and open space for curiosity.
Active listening techniques
Active listening is more than hearing words; it’s about signaling you understand and making space for the other person’s perspective. Practicing these techniques makes others feel heard and, paradoxically, can make them more open to changing their mind.
Use reflective statements
Paraphrase what you heard: “So you’re saying…,” or “It sounds like you feel… because….” Reflecting shows attention and gives the other person a chance to correct misunderstandings. When you reflect accurately, it lowers tension and improves clarity.
Ask open-ended questions
Questions that start with “how,” “what,” or “tell me about” invite storytelling and deeper explanation. These questions move discussion away from one-liners and create context that helps you understand the reasons behind beliefs.
Resist the urge to interrupt
Interrupting signals judgment and often escalates defensiveness, while silence invites elaboration. Giving pauses after someone speaks creates an environment where thoughtfulness replaces reflex.
Perspective-taking practices
Taking another person’s perspective is a skill that strengthens with intentional practice; it’s not something you either have or don’t have. These exercises give you concrete ways to step into someone else’s shoes without losing your own identity.
Ask “What led you here?”
Curious questions about life experiences help you map how someone’s background shaped their beliefs. Context often explains why a position feels reasonable to them, even if it conflicts with your values.
Role-play scenarios
Temporarily adopt the other person’s position in a structured role-play and try to argue it sincerely. This forces you to find the strongest version of their argument and reduces straw-manning.
Imagine their internal dialogue
Try to picture what the other person might be telling themselves—what worries, hopes, or memories shape their current stance. This mental rehearsal increases compassion by humanizing motives.
Empathy scripts and phrases
Having ready-made phrases helps you respond calmly and constructively in heated moments, so you don’t resort to reactive language. Use these lines as tools to validate and engage without endorsing views you disagree with.
Validation without endorsement
You can say: “I understand why you’d feel that way given your experience,” or “That makes sense from your perspective.” These statements acknowledge feelings and reasoning without conceding the argument.
Gentle curiosity prompts
Try: “Can you tell me more about what you mean?” or “What experiences shaped that belief?” These prompts signal genuine interest and invite elaboration.
De-escalation lines
When emotions rise, use: “I want to understand you better. Can we slow down for a minute?” or “I’m feeling triggered right now; I need a moment to respond thoughtfully.” These phrases protect the dialogue while honoring your internal state.
Emotional regulation strategies
Managing your emotions lets you remain available to understand the other person, rather than being consumed by your reaction. You’ll be more persuasive and less reactive when you regulate your nervous system effectively.
Use grounding techniques
Name five things you see, four things you can touch, three sounds you hear, two things you can smell, and one thing you can taste to return to the present. Grounding provides immediate reduction in distress and helps clear mental fog.
Practice distress tolerance
Short-term toleration skills—like focused breathing, progressive muscle relaxation, or counting breath cycles—help you wait out strong feelings without acting impulsively. These tools also show the other person you are committed to the conversation.
Reframe physiological signals
Recognize that increased heart rate or sweating is your body preparing to respond, not proof that you’re right or that the conversation is failing. Labeling the sensation as “nervous energy” can reduce escalation and keep you engaged.
Finding common ground and shared values
You do not need to agree on every policy to find shared human values that bridge gaps. Identifying even a single overlapping value shifts the tone from adversarial to collaborative.
Hunt for universal needs
Ask questions that surface underlying needs—safety, dignity, belonging, autonomy—rather than positions. When you discuss shared needs instead of surface disagreements, solutions become more creative and cooperative.
Use value framing
Reframe your points to align with the other person’s values: if they prioritize freedom, talk about empowerment; if they prioritize community, emphasize social responsibility. This doesn’t mean manipulation; it’s translation to make your case more comprehensible.
Create joint goals
Propose a small, shared objective you can both agree on, like improving local services or reducing harm in a particular area. Working side-by-side on a tangible goal builds trust and shows each person’s intentions.
Narrative immersion: stories change minds
Stories are powerful because they create context and evoke emotion where facts alone often fail. When you step into someone else’s narrative, you gain access to motives and choices that explain their views.
Invite personal stories
Ask open-ended questions that encourage storytelling, such as, “What happened in your life that influenced this view?” Personal stories make abstract positions concrete and humanize the person behind them. Listening to stories reduces stereotyping and fosters empathy.
Use your own stories strategically
Share a concise, vulnerable story about a moment that shaped your perspective; this models openness and invites reciprocity. Personal narratives build rapport and make your arguments more relatable.
Contrast facts with narratives
Remember that data convinces the mind but stories move the heart; use both in appropriate measures. When you pair evidence with a human-centered story, you make your perspective easier to understand and harder to dismiss.
Structured conversation models
Using a framework for difficult discussions reduces reactivity and improves outcomes, because the structure sets expectations and norms. These models help keep the conversation fair and focused.
Nonviolent Communication (NVC) model
NVC encourages observing without judgment, naming feelings and needs, and making requests rather than demands. Practicing NVC creates a shared language for strong emotions and disagreements.
Motivational interviewing techniques
Motivational interviewing asks open questions, affirms, reflects, and summarizes to elicit someone’s own motivations for change. When you use these techniques you become a guide rather than an adversary.
Time-bound agreements
Set a time limit for heated topics and agree on a process for continuing the conversation later. Time boundaries prevent escalation and allow both parties to return with clearer heads.
Practical exercises you can do daily
Consistency matters: short, regular exercises build habits that transform how you listen and respond. These activities fit into everyday life and compound into real change.
10-minute perspective challenge
Each day, choose a news article or social media post you disagree with and write a paragraph summarizing the strongest argument for the other side. This trains your cognitive empathy and reduces black-and-white thinking.
Empathy journaling
After difficult conversations, journal what you think the other person felt, what might have led them to feel that way, and one thing you learned. Over time, the journal becomes a record of growth and a tool for reflection.
Friend-of-a-friend interviews
Ask someone you trust to describe a person with opposing views in their life and then interview them about that person’s background and motives. This indirect method reduces defensiveness and widens your perspective.
Scripts for high-stakes or heated moments
When stakes or emotions are high, having scripts ready prevents reactive language and preserves dignity for both parties. Use these as templates you adapt to the moment.
Example de-escalation script
“I’m hearing a lot of passion in what you’re saying. I want to understand you better, but I’m starting to feel overwhelmed. Can we take a short break and come back to this with a goal to listen for each other’s main concerns?” This script acknowledges emotion and suggests a constructive pause.
Example curiosity-first script
“I might be missing important context. Could you help me understand what experiences shaped your thinking on this?” This invites explanation without judgment and signals genuine interest.
Example boundary script
“I value this relationship, but I can’t continue if the conversation turns into personal attacks. I’m happy to keep talking if we can stick to the issue.” This protects your wellbeing while keeping the door open.
When empathy is not appropriate
Empathy is powerful, but it’s not always the right tool—especially when your physical or emotional safety is at risk. Recognizing these limits protects you from harm.
Abusive or manipulative situations
If someone uses your empathic responses to manipulate you or violates boundaries, prioritize safety and consider professional help or exit strategies. You do not owe understanding to someone who weaponizes vulnerability.
Moral injury and complicity
If trying to understand someone would make you complicit in harm or deeply violate your values, set clear boundaries and choose appropriate forms of engagement. You can still seek to understand structural causes without normalizing harmful behavior.
Measuring your progress
You can track empathy growth through observable changes in behavior rather than vague feelings. Concrete markers help you stay motivated and identify where you still need practice.
Behavioral indicators
Notice if you interrupt less, ask more open-ended questions, or maintain curiosity in tense conversations. These outward changes are reliable signs of increased empathy.
Reflection metrics
Keep a weekly log: number of meaningful conversations, number of times you used a de-escalation script, and moments you felt less triggered. Over months, patterns will show improvement and remaining challenges.
Feedback and accountability
Ask trusted peers for candid feedback after conversations, and consider coaching or therapy if you want structured growth. External perspectives accelerate learning by pointing out blind spots.
Common pitfalls and how to correct them
You will make mistakes while learning empathy, and that’s normal; what matters is adjusting and continuing. Recognizing common traps prevents discouragement and regression.
Performing empathy
If your empathy feels rote or insincere, the other person will sense it and disengage. Slow down and focus on genuine curiosity and presence rather than checking off empathy techniques.
Moral grandstanding
Using empathy to signal virtue rather than to understand undermines trust and often provokes resentment. Aim for authenticity: your intention should be understanding, not moral superiority.
Over-identifying with the other person
Losing your own perspective or suppressing your values to mirror someone else is not true empathy. Maintain your boundaries and remember that understanding doesn’t require agreement.
Neuroscience and psychology of empathy
A basic understanding of how empathy works in the brain can help you use strategies that actually change neural patterns. Empathy engages brain networks related to social cognition, emotion regulation, and reward, and repeated practice strengthens these pathways.
Mirror neurons and emotional contagion
Mirror systems can make you feel another person’s emotions automatically, which is useful but can also lead to overwhelm. Learning to regulate and label emotions prevents emotional contagion from derailing your objectivity.
Prefrontal cortex and cognitive empathy
Your ability to take another’s perspective is tied to prefrontal executive functions like attention and working memory. Strengthening these cognitive skills through practice supports sustained perspective-taking.
Using media and literature to build empathy
Stories from other cultures, biographies, or films can act as low-risk ways to practice perspective-taking and broaden your emotional vocabulary. Curating your media diet intentionally gives you controlled exposure to diverse human experiences.
Fiction and memoirs
Reading long-form narratives immerses you in a character’s interior life and makes unfamiliar perspectives feel empathetically accessible. Choose books that represent viewpoints you rarely encounter in your social circle.
Documentaries and interviews
Nonfiction narratives contextualize positions with historical and personal nuance, helping you understand systemic influences. Pair viewing with reflective questions to deepen learning.
Practical table: Empathy techniques at a glance
This table summarizes techniques, when to use them, and practical steps so you can apply the right tool at the right time.
| Technique | When to use it | Practical steps |
|---|---|---|
| Reflective listening | In active conversations | Paraphrase, check for accuracy, avoid rebuttal |
| Open-ended questions | When you want context | Use “how” and “what” questions; avoid “why” in accusatory tone |
| Narrative invitation | To humanize perspectives | Ask for a story or example that shaped beliefs |
| Grounding/breathing | When you’re triggered | 4-4-6 breathing, 5-4-3-2-1 grounding |
| Role-play | To strengthen cognitive empathy | Argue the other side for 5–10 minutes sincerely |
| Boundary statements | When safety or values are compromised | State limits plainly and offer alternatives |
| Value framing | To reframe arguments | Translate your point into the other person’s core values |
Exercises for groups and communities
If you want to build empathy on a larger scale, structured group activities can create shared norms and skillful practice. These methods promote communal learning and reduce polarizing habits.
Paired storytelling circles
Pair participants and give each 7 minutes to tell a personal story about a formative event while the other listens without interruption. After both speak, each listener summarizes what they heard to practice reflective listening.
Perspective spectrum
Create a physical line representing a spectrum on an issue and have people stand where they feel. Invite volunteers from different positions to speak about why they stand where they do. This visualizes nuance and shows that many positions exist between extremes.
Listening agreements
Set group norms for respectful listening—no interruptions, curiosity questions only, and time limits for responses. Agreements lower the chance of escalation and model fair conversation.
Resources for further learning
Continuing practice with books, courses, and community resources accelerates your growth and gives you deeper frameworks. These resources offer both theory and practical exercises you can use solo or in groups.
Recommended reading
Look for books on conflict resolution, nonviolent communication, and narratives from diverse voices to widen your perspective. Reading broadly gives you both intellectual and emotional tools for empathetic engagement.
Training and workshops
Seek out workshops on active listening, restorative justice circles, or dialogue facilitation for experiential learning. These trainings provide feedback and guided practice that are hard to replicate alone.
Final thoughts and long-term habits
Building deeper empathy is a lifelong project that pays off in stronger relationships and more constructive public life. Make small, regular efforts, track progress, and be kind to yourself when you falter—empathy grows with deliberate, repeated practice.
Commit to continuous practice
Schedule short empathy exercises into your weekly routine, such as one perspective challenge or journaling session each day. Small, consistent habits compound into meaningful change over months and years.
Balance empathy with boundaries
Practice empathy while protecting your mental and physical health; you can be compassionate without tolerating harm. Your growth in empathy should increase your relational capacity, not erode your self-respect.
Keep learning and adjusting
You will discover what works for you through trial and error, and adjusting your approach is part of the process. Stay curious about your own reactions, and treat each difficult conversation as an opportunity to practice a better way of relating.