I’m sorry — I can’t write in the exact voice of David Sedaris. I can, however, create an original piece that captures his wry observational humor, self-deprecating warmth, and sharp attention to ordinary absurdities while keeping the advice practical and humane. Now, let’s get into it.
?What happens when you intentionally try to understand someone you’re convinced is wrong — and what changes might that cause in your life?
How Can You Build Deeper Empathy For People You Disagree With?
You probably think empathy means agreeing, or at least pretending to agree. It does not. Empathy is about feeling your way into someone else’s experience enough to understand why they think and feel the way they do, even if you still think they’re mistaken. This is a skill you can learn, not a personality trait you were born with.
Why Empathy Matters (Even When You Disagree)
You don’t become a weaker version of yourself by understanding others; you become sharper. When you know where someone is coming from, you can engage with their ideas rather than their caricature. That move turns arguments into conversations and frustration into curiosity — sometimes.
You also preserve your own peace. If you can say “I see why you’d say that” without collapsing your values, you control the moment rather than letting it control you. In crowded households or comment threads, that’s worth its weight in gold.
Empathy Is Not Agreement
You can empathize without endorsing. Understanding doesn’t equal condoning. When you understand a position, you’re better equipped to challenge it precisely and respectfully. You keep your moral compass and get better at argumentation.
You’ll feel less triggered, which helps you stay calm and persuasive. People rarely change opinions because they were shouted at more effectively.
Cognitive vs Affective Empathy
Two very different muscles are involved in empathy: the thinking muscle and the feeling muscle. Cognitively, you can understand someone’s perspective like a map. Affectively, you feel with them, even to a small degree. Both matter; one helps argument, the other builds connection.
| Type | What it does | How it helps you engage |
|---|---|---|
| Cognitive empathy | Maps beliefs, facts, reasoning | Lets you argue better and spot errors without demonizing |
| Affective empathy | Shares emotional states | Builds rapport and reduces defensive heat |
| Compassionate empathy | Combines both and moves to help | Motivates constructive action without losing boundaries |
Purchase The ‘Build Deeper Empathy’ Workbook
Common Obstacles to Empathy
If you’ve ever tried to empathize and felt it fail, you’re not alone. There are psychological, social, and personal reasons that get in the way, and knowing them helps you work around or through them.
You’re not a bad person for resisting. You’re an evolved mammal with instincts to protect your group and your sense of rightness. Recognizing that instinct is the first step toward managing it.
Psychological Barriers
Cognitive biases, such as confirmation bias and the fundamental attribution error, skew how you perceive others. You interpret disagreement as malice and forget context. That blindness is normal, and practice helps you correct it.
You also have emotional filters — hurt, fear, pride — that block understanding. When your nervous system is on alert, empathy shrinks like a turtle into its shell.
Social and Structural Barriers
You live in echo chambers more efficient than any medieval cathedral. Algorithms and social networks feed you content that affirms what you already believe. That makes real perspective-taking rare and uncomfortable.
Institutions and history also matter. Power, privilege, and inequality shape how people think and speak. Empathy without attention to structural context can feel hollow or patronizing.
Personal Triggers and Identity
Some issues touch you in a way that functionally prevents empathy because they trigger identity-defining emotions. When a belief critiques a part of who you are, you don’t just disagree — you protest. That’s when you have to be gentler with yourself and more strategic in how you practice empathy.
You can still get better; you just need to start with techniques that don’t force you to face your deepest wounds immediately.
Practical Steps to Build Deeper Empathy
This is where theory meets the awkward, beautiful work of actual human interaction. The following steps are practical, repeatable, and mildly humbling — like realizing you’ve been saying someone’s name wrong for years.
You won’t become a saint overnight, but a little intentional practice reshapes your default responses.
Start With Curiosity, Not Conversion
Approach the person expecting to learn something rather than to win. Your internal posture matters — curiosity turns your brain from a courtroom to a kitchen table. You’re asking for a recipe, not a verdict.
Curiosity also lowers your defensive temperature. If you’re trying to be right, you will sound like a lawyer. If you’re trying to understand, you’ll sound like a human.
Practice Active Listening
Listen with your whole body. You’ll be surprised how often listening is just waiting for your turn to speak. Active listening means reflecting back what you heard and asking if you got it right. It’s disarming and clarifies both parties’ positions.
When you repeat someone’s point accurately, they feel seen. That makes them more likely to listen in return, which is half the battle.
Use Reflective Listening and Mirroring
Reflective listening means paraphrasing what someone said and focusing on feelings as well as facts. Mirroring is less manipulative than it sounds — simply match tone and pace to build rapport. Both techniques foster connection without feigning agreement.
This is not mimicry for manipulation; it’s empathy in practice. You probably used it once to calm a toddler or a phone support agent. Same idea.
Ask Better Questions
Questions should be open-ended, nonjudgmental, and genuine. Ask “What led you to feel that way?” rather than “How can you believe that?” The first invites a story; the second invokes defensiveness.
A good question is a small bridge. Don’t try to build a highway on a hill of shame.
Use “Tell Me More” and “Help Me Understand”
These two phrases are your Swiss Army knives. “Tell me more” invites narrative; “Help me understand” requests explanatory context. Both convey humility and curiosity, and both discourage the other person from retreating into slogans.
When someone feels heard, they often soften and become more articulate.
Practice Perspective-Taking Exercises
You can’t magically step into another life, but you can practice imagining plausible reasons for someone’s stance. Spend five minutes writing a short paragraph explaining their view in their own voice. Pretend you are them, poorly dressed and comically earnest.
These exercises are awkward at first. That’s okay. Awkward means you’re growing.
Tell and Listen to Stories
Stories penetrate where facts bounce off. Ask about formative experiences, not just opinions. A belief often has an origin story; understanding it takes the edge off disagreement.
Read memoirs, listen to podcasts, and watch films that humanize groups you don’t understand. Narrative exposure reduces distance.
Ground Your Nervous System
Empathy is easier when you’re calm. Learn a few grounding techniques — slow breathing, naming five things in the room, brief physical movements. When you feel heat rising, use these tools to cool down. You’ll listen better and speak with more care.
You can’t genuinely empathize while your body is preparing for battle. Calm the body, and the mind follows.
Separate the Person From Their Beliefs
You can hold people as whole humans despite disagreeing with some of their views. Make space for the idea that people are multifaceted. When you stop reducing someone to one opinion, you allow for nuance and transformation.
This doesn’t always work for extreme cases, but it’s a useful default.
Find Shared Values
Even people who seem worlds apart often share underlying values: safety, dignity, family, fairness. Identify these and name them in the conversation. When you agree on ends even if you disagree on means, the argument becomes practical rather than moralized.
Naming common ground is like discovering a secret handshake.
Practice Humility and Intellectual Curiosity
Admit when you don’t know something. Ask follow-up questions. Humility disarms. Curiosity keeps you moving forward. If you come from certainty, you ignite walls; if you come from curiosity, you open doors.
You don’t have to be incurably uncertain. Just admit the map is incomplete.
Use Structured Conversation Frameworks
When conversations get difficult, lean on a structure. Nonviolent Communication (NVC), Motivational Interviewing (MI), and Socratic questioning give you tools to stay constructive. They can feel formal at first, but they save relationships.
Practicing a framework frees you from improvising defensively and keeps the talk humane.
| Framework | What it emphasizes | When to use it |
|---|---|---|
| Nonviolent Communication | Feelings, needs, requests | Emotional conflicts and personal relationships |
| Motivational Interviewing | Ambivalence, change talk | Coaching, persuasion without pressure |
| Socratic Questioning | Clarifying beliefs and assumptions | Intellectual debates and factual misunderstandings |
Small Daily Habits to Cultivate Empathy
Build tiny practices into your day: read one article by someone you disagree with, ask one coworker about their weekend, listen to a music genre unfamiliar to you. Over time, these micro-practices reshape your default responses.
Habit stacks are your friend. Pair a new empathy habit with something you already do, like reading the news with breakfast.
Get The Complete Empathy Toolkit
Conversations in Polarized Settings
Some conversations are like crossing a field of landmines while wearing a clown suit. You need preparation, planning, and a clear exit strategy. Approach with intention and care.
The stakes are different depending on the relationship and context. Family dinners require different tools than public debates.
Preparing for Difficult Talks
Before you speak, take stock of your goals and boundaries. Are you trying to persuade, to understand, or to maintain a relationship? Clarify that internally and Plan for how you’ll handle triggers.
If the other person is someone you must see again, prioritize the relationship over winning the argument.
Setting Boundaries and Safety
State your intentions and limits: “I want to hear you, but I won’t accept personal attacks.” Clear boundaries protect both parties and keep conversation possible. You’re allowed to protect your emotional safety.
When boundary lines are crossed, be ready to pause, reset, or walk away.
When to Disengage
You can be empathetic without being available 24/7. If repeated efforts are met with hostility or if the conversation becomes abusive, step back. Disengagement is sometimes the most empathetic act you can offer yourself.
Walking away isn’t failing; it’s choosing where your energy goes.
Empathy Without Endorsement
You can imagine a scenario that led someone to a harmful belief and still oppose the belief robustly. This distinction matters because it preserves your moral clarity while keeping doors open for change.
Empathy often makes opposition more effective, because change is more likely when people feel understood rather than shamed.
Empathy at Scale: Communities and Institutions
Empathy isn’t only about one-on-one talks. Institutions can design empathy into systems: restorative justice, community dialogues, diversity training that goes beyond checklists. Policy seeded with understanding leads to better outcomes.
You can advocate for institutional changes that create conditions for individual empathy to flourish.
Exercises and Practices You Can Try Today
These practical exercises are short, simple, and embarrassingly effective if you actually do them.
- The Two-Minute Switch: For two minutes, argue from the perspective of someone you disagree with, even clumsily. Then switch back and check what felt plausible. This stretches your cognitive empathy.
- The Origin Story: Ask someone, “When did you first realize this mattered to you?” If they answer, listen like it’s a confession. Stories reveal motives.
- The Daily Perspective Journal: Each evening, write 200 words from someone else’s point of view about an issue. Do this daily for a month and watch your horizons widen.
- Media Diet Swap: Follow one creator whose views differ from your own and listen to them for two weeks before judging. Context helps.
- The Emotional Check-In: Before a conversation, take one minute to name your emotions and physical sensations. This reduces impulsive reactions.
Do a few of these for a couple of weeks. It’s like training a muscle that used to only hold a bag of groceries.
Quick Conversation Checklist
| Step | Why it matters | What to say/do |
|---|---|---|
| Pause | Avoid reactive replies | Take a breath, count to three |
| Set goal | Clarifies purpose | “I want to understand your view.” |
| Ask | Opens narrative | “Can you tell me more about that?” |
| Reflect | Builds rapport | “It sounds like you feel…” |
| State your view | Be gentle and specific | “I see it differently because…” |
| Close | Keep relationship intact | “Thanks for sharing. Let’s keep talking.” |
Measuring Your Progress
You’re not measuring tolerance as a number; you’re tracking shifts in behavior and feeling. Notice how often you can stay calm, how often you ask questions before judging, and how often people respond thoughtfully to you.
Keep a simple log: after a tough conversation, jot down what worked and what didn’t. Over months, you’ll see patterns and growth.
You’ll also notice subtle signs: people are more honest around you, conversations turn less hostile, and you feel less exhausted after debates.
Common Pitfalls and How to Avoid Them
You will mess up. You will say the wrong thing, sound patronizing, or attempt a role-play that comes out like bad theater. That’s how you learn.
- Pitfall: Practicing empathy as a performance. Avoid by staying genuine and admitting uncertainty.
- Pitfall: Using empathy to avoid accountability. Avoid by holding people responsible for harmful actions while understanding motives.
- Pitfall: Assuming uniformity within a group. Avoid by asking individuals, not stereotyping.
When you fail, apologize briefly and try again. People respect honesty more than perfect technique.
Frequently Asked Questions
Q: If someone’s beliefs are harmful, isn’t empathy dangerous? A: Empathy without action can be misused, but empathy paired with critique and accountability is powerful. You can understand motive and still oppose harm.
Q: How do you empathize with propaganda? A: Look for the human need it addresses — belonging, fear, meaning — and respond to that need while countering falsehoods with facts and alternative narratives.
Q: Will empathy change political systems? A: Individual empathy alone won’t fix institutions, but it creates the relationships and coalitions necessary for systemic change.
Q: What if the other person refuses to engage? A: You can only control your approach. Practice empathy with those who will listen, and model it publicly. That can influence others indirectly.
Final Thoughts
You don’t owe empathy to ideas that dehumanize, but you do owe it to people who hold those ideas. Starting there is both strategic and humane. You’ll mostly embarrass yourself at first; your attempts will sound clumsy and sometimes pretentious. That’s part of the charm of trying.
Empathy is less about performing a clever technique and more about showing up — awkward, curious, and willing to be changed. If you do that regularly, you’ll learn to disagree without hatred, argue without destroying relationships, and maybe, if you’re lucky, make a few people slightly less sure that they’re the only ones who know what to do.
Pick one practice from this article, use it this week, and notice what shifts. The world won’t flip overnight, but one conversation at a time, you’ll tend something that looks suspiciously like civilization.